“Know how to solve every problem that has been solved.” “What I cannot create, I do not understand.” — Richard Feynman

Basis sets: why Gaussians win

Learn

Lesson 3 of 24 standard ~4 min

To treat molecules we expand each orbital in a fixed set of simple functions — a basis. The physically natural choice, Slater functions e^{−ζr}, have the right shape (a cusp at the nucleus, a slow exponential tail) — but their integrals across several atomic centres have no closed form.

Gaussians e^{−αr²} have the wrong shape but one magic property: the product of two Gaussians on different atoms is a single Gaussian on a point between them. That collapse makes every multi-centre integral analytic. We stack a few Gaussians (STO-3G uses three per orbital) to imitate the Slater shape we gave up.

standardMultiple choice

Why does quantum chemistry build orbitals out of Gaussians rather than the more physically-accurate Slater functions?